Obama plans to increase support for global health
President Barack Obama's budget proposals placed before the US Congress include, as part of an overall increase for expenditure on global health, a remarkable rise in funding for the war against neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). From $65 million in 2010, the budget proposal for 2011 would increase expenditure on these diseases to $155 million.
President Barak Obama’s budget proposals
placed before the US Congress include, as part of an overall increase
for expenditure on global health, a remarkable rise in funding for the
war against neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). From $65 million in
2010, the budget proposal for 2011 would increase expenditure on these
diseases to $155 million.
The President’s budget request for global health amounts to $9.6 billion, which would be spent by programmes within the State Department, the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Health & Human Services, and the Defense Department. It represents a 9% increase on the $8.8 billion which will be spent during 2010.
WHO estimates that more than one billion people, or one-sixth of the
world’s population, suffer from one or more NTDs, and President Obama
stated in July last year that he intended to increase NTD funding, as
part of a broadening of the focus of global health efforts – see TropIKA.net News
.
His administration is said to be establishing specific timetables for
the elimination or partially elimination of three NTDs – leprosy,
lymphatic filariasis, and onchocersiasis. Other diseases so far
targeted in the US NTDs programme are schistosomiasis, trachoma, and
soil-transmitted helminthiases.
Dr Peter Hotez, president of the Sabin Vaccine Institute and a leading figure in NTD research, said in a Reuters
interview that it was no accident that most of the funding would be
made available via the State Department: “[NTDs] disproportionately
affect countries of global security interest to the United States –
countries from the Islamic conference, nuclear weapons countries. This
also has important implications for foreign policy and the State
Department”. He went on to describe the low costs required to
successfully treat NTDs and the economic benefits.

